Should housework be shared more equally between partners?

houseworkWomen do more housework than men. For most of history this phenomenon went largely unremarked. Housework was what women did, while men supported their families with paid work. However, the role of women has been changing: women’s educational levels are now at least as good as those of men; most women do paid work for most of their adult lives; and although gender pay gaps still exist, women’s earnings (in particular, the earnings of younger childless women) have been gradually approaching those of men. While things have also been changing in the domestic sphere, with men doing an increasing share of housework and childcare, surveys still show that women do the lion’s share of housework – even in households where both partners have full-time paid jobs.

Several theories have been proposed as to why unequal shares of housework have persisted even in the context when women do about as much paid work as men. The full range of these theories is discussed in a new IZA paper. The work by Katrin Auspurg, Maria Iacovou and Cheti Nicoletti investigates one strand of theory, namely the suggestion that men and women have systematically different preferences over housework because of internalized gender norms. Variants of this theory, which essentially proposes that women like housework more (or dislike it less) than men do, have been put forward by both economists and sociologists.

Previous attempts to test this theory empirically have been based on information on reported satisfaction or well-being gathered from surveys. These potentially suffer from a number of problems. First, surveys find so few households in which the man does most of the housework that it’s impossible to obtain reliable estimates of how people feel about these arrangements. Second, there is a potential problem of post-hoc rationalization – it’s likely that reported preferences are affected by people making the best of the situation in which they actually find themselves. And third, because preferences may be affected by some of the same factors which drive the amount of housework that people do, it’s almost impossible to work out the direction of any causal relationships.

The new paper takes a different approach, using data from an experiment conducted in the course of the Innovation Panel of Understanding Society. Men and women were presented with hypothetical scenarios (“vignettes”) in which several factors varied: the distribution of housework; the distribution of paid work; earnings; the presence of children; and whether the couple had paid help with housework. Each respondent was presented with three different scenarios, and was asked to rate how satisfied they would be with each scenario on a scale from 1 (completely dissatisfied) to 7 (completely satisfied). In all, 4,547 valid responses were obtained from 1,609 respondents.

The results show that:

(1)       Both men and women prefer scenarios in which housework is shared more or less equally between members of a couple. They dislike scenarios in which their partner does most of the housework almost as much as they dislike scenarios in which they themselves do most of the housework.

(2)       People consider paid work and housework in combination when assessing the scenarios. The general unpopularity of unequal housework distributions is reduced in scenarios where the partner doing more housework is doing less paid work, and increased in scenarios where the partner doing more housework is doing more paid work.

(3)       Men’s and women’s preferences are remarkably similar over virtually the entire range of possible scenarios. The only discernible difference between the sexes is that women are less favorably disposed than men to working full-time themselves while their partner works part-time. But this difference is small and relates to paid work rather than housework.

The authors therefore conclude that there is no evidence that preferences over housework differ between the sexes as the result of internalized gender norms, and that the reasons behind the gendered allocation of housework must lie elsewhere, perhaps in the different bargaining strategies employed by men and women.

Download the paper:
Housework Share between Partners: Experimental Evidence on Gender Identity [PDF]

Posted in Research | Tagged , , , , , | Leave a comment

Can migration boost incomes, happiness and freedom satisfaction?


Carol Graham, Milena Nikolova

By Carol Graham and Milena Nikolova

The recent economic crisis and the subsequent lagging economic recovery renewed the immigration debate in the United States and beyond. While there are benefits from migration for the recipient economies, there are also potential costs, which range from concerns about migrants adding to the ranks of welfare systems, to threats to the jobs of natives, to the difficulties of assimilating migrants from different countries and cultures. On balance, migration’s benefits for the destination economies outweigh the costs: immigrants are net contributors to public coffers and complementarities between low-skilled immigrants and natives may exist, particularly when new migrants take low-skilled jobs that native workers eschew. While the effect of migration on the well-being of native populations is important, so is the question of how migrants fare once they reach their destination countries.

In part, this is because of the sheer magnitude of migration stocks: about 232 million people lived outside their country of birth in 2013. Most migrants move across international borders to maximize their earnings and to gain opportunities, and most do make significant income gains. Whether these earnings gains are mirrored by improvements in reported well-being and broader quality of life is still largely an open question, however.

Higher levels of immigrant well-being can be instrumentally important for social outcomes such as public health and productivity, as happier individuals are typically more productive and healthier. In contrast, immigrant dissatisfaction may reflect lack of assimilation and social exclusion, and even extremist attitudes among natives, all of which can result in social unrest and lower economic output. From the point of view of the sending countries, meanwhile, emigrant well-being is important as migrants send remittances and contribute to the well-being of their home countries through investments, the spread of ideas, and technology.

Understanding the well-being consequences of migrating is challenging, as comparing migrants with those who did not migrate in either the sending or the destination countries is methodologically flawed. Such comparisons may simply reflect the traits of those who choose to migrate, and who may have differences in ability, risk tolerance, aspirations, and motivation, for example. The direction of causality between well-being and migration is also unclear: while migration may influence well-being, the reverse can also be true. While migration may indeed affect happiness, a recent paper using South American data finds that respondents who intend to migrate in the next year are wealthier and more educated than the average, but also less happy and more critical of their current and future economic opportunities.

Despite the large income gains typically associated with migrating, it can also be accompanied by declining happiness because of adaptation and rising aspirations. While migrants’ (absolute) incomes increase, so do their expectations as they compare themselves to high-earning natives in the host countries. In a recent IZA Discussion Paper, we use Gallup World Poll data and statistical techniques to understand the well-being consequences of migration for movers from transition economies to advanced nations. Like other studies, we find unequivocal income increases due to migration. More importantly, we show that there are significant gains in life satisfaction and in perceptions of freedom. (See Figure 1 for the average well-being outcomes of migrants and stayers in the pre- and post-periods).


migration_fig2migration_fig3We studied migrants from transition and post-transition societies as they are quantitatively the most important migration source for the OECD economies in Europe. To illustrate, in 2012, Poland and Romania were among the top three migrant sources of OECD migrants. Migrants from transition economies leave countries, which are relatively more advanced and culturally similar to the destination countries, compared with movers from Asia, Africa, and Latin America, for example.

We find that migrants from transition countries achieve a better quality of life after they go abroad. The average household income premium from migration for our sample is about 21,000 international dollars (about 10,500 ID per household member). And even if reference norms and aspirations change, migrants’ life satisfaction also improves. The average benefit is substantively and statistically significant: an increase of about 1.0-1.2 (on a life satisfaction scale 0-10). Third, and perhaps most important, migration positively affects perceptions of freedom of choice, with migrants from the most recent EU enlargements being nearly 40 percent more satisfied with their freedom. Data from around the world show that freedom to seek life fulfillment is a pivotal element of human well-being.

At a time when there is ample reason to be concerned about the state of world affairs, our research findings are a “happy” story highlighting that by voting with their feet, migrants from transition economies can improve their well-being. Surely migration does not solve the problems in the countries the migrants left, nor can we be confident at this stage that our results apply to migrants from different origins and/or to those migrating to different destinations. Yet it does suggest that win-win outcomes are possible from increasing mobility in global labor markets. That is a story worth learning more about.

This post also appeared on the Brookings Institutions’s UP FRONT blog.

Milena Nikolova is a Research Associate at IZA and a Nonresident Fellow at Brookings. Carol Graham is the Leo Pasvolsky Senior Fellow at Brookings, College Park Professor at the University of Maryland, and a Research Fellow at IZA.

Posted in Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Yes, Germans do believe in fiscal flexibility

Klaus F. Zimmermann Direktor IZA

Klaus F. Zimmermann

Investors were spooked recently by suggestions that global growth may be slowing. Germany came in for particular attention as industrial production and exports both fell, warning that a recession may be on the way. World leaders, especially in Europe, are once again claiming that salvation can come only when Germany finally abandons its rigorous fiscal austerity and launches a Keynesian spending binge. This is preposterous.

To start, Germany’s current fiscal posture isn’t austere. “Austerity” suggests a pro-cyclical cutting of public expenditures amid a profound economic crisis, typically to undo the distortions of previous spending binges. Germany has not practiced this at home, in its early-2000s reform period or after the 2008 global financial crisis. Nor has Berlin advocated such policies for its European partners since then. Even in the case of Greece, Germany was among those advocating aggressive fiscal stabilization to avoid a broader eurozone crisis, but the emphasis is now on making that country competitive by moderating labor costs and emphasizing innovation.

[Read full text] of this op-ed in: The Wall Street Journal Europe, October 15, 2015.


Posted in Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , | Leave a comment

Why aging and working makes us happy – in four charts


Carol Graham, Milena Nikolova

By Carol Graham and Milena Nikolova

In the past few years, economists and other social scientists have made great strides in developing measures to assess subjective well-being (or, more colloquially, happiness), which has deepened our understanding of well-being beyond the traditional income dimensions. There are remarkably consistent patterns in the determinants of subjective well-being across people within and across countries and cultures around the world. One of the most striking of these is the relationship between age and happiness (which is good news for those of us who are already on the “back-nine”). There is a U-shaped curve, with the low point in happiness being at roughly age 40 around  the world, with some modest differences across countries. It seems that our veneration of (or for some of us, nostalgia, for)  youth as the happiest times of our lives is overblown, the middle age years are, well, as expected, and then things get better as we age, as long as we are reasonably healthy (age-adjusted) and in a stable partnership.

happiness_fig1There are other consistent patterns. Income matters to individual happiness in every context we have studied this relationship. Yet after basic needs are met, other things like how your income compares to that of your peers also start to matter. Moreover, married people (and those in a civil union) are typically happier than their non-married counterparts (there is a direction-of-causality-issue here, though, as happier people are more likely to marry each other); healthier people are happier; and women are, in most places, happier than men (as long as gender rights are not severely compromised).

happiness_fig2Another variable that is absolutely critical for subjective well-being is employment status. The unemployed are less happy than the employed worldwide. And both psychologists and economists find that long-term unemployment has psychological scarring effects. Long-term unemployment and under-employment, and the youth’s delayed entrance into employment, coupled with the over-burdened pension systems, are major problems in the U.S. and Europe. At a time when these issues have risen to the fore, it is perhaps worth considering more flexible labor market arrangements. While several solutions have been proposed, we are left wondering whether there would be public receptivity to changing labor market arrangements. While this is hard to predict, what we can measure – and did in our recent article in the IZA Journal of European Labor Studies – is the well-being costs and benefits of different work arrangements. As we argue in the study, different employment and retirement arrangements may be appropriate for people at different stages of their lives, depending on their career goals or innate well-being levels. Understanding how employment, retirement, and late-life work relate to well-being can contribute to ongoing public policy discussions. Continue reading

Posted in Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Immigrant women: Not just secondary workers any more

flag-220040_1280Immigrant women in the labor market have long been viewed as “secondary workers” who work in unskilled jobs, mainly as a response to family needs and to support their husbands’ skills upgrading. As household financial constraints ease with men’s assimilation in their destination country, women’s labor market participation is expected to drop again. An IZA paper by Alícia Adserà and Ana Ferrer on immigrant women in Canada finds that this is no longer true.

The authors combine data of over 800,000 women in Canada for the period 1991 to 2006 with information on the skill requirements of the jobs women hold (such as physical strength or analytical abilities) to examine the labor market patterns of immigrant women. They show that the recent behavior of married immigrant women does not fit the profile of secondary workers, but rather conforms to the recent patterns of native Canadian wives, with rising participation in the labor market and wage gains as they stay longer in Canada.

Immigrant women’s  behavior displays a path of assimilation similar to that of immigrant men. They increasingly make labor supply decisions guided by their own opportunities in the labor market rather than by their husbands’ trajectories. At best, only uneducated immigrant women in jobs requiring very basic skills may fit the profile of secondary workers with slow skill mobility and low-status job-traps.

Read abstract or download complete paper (PDF).

Posted in Research | Tagged , , , , , , , , | Comments Off

Solomon Polachek on equal pay and the gender wage gap

In a video interview, IZA Fellow Solomon Polachek (State University of New York at Binghamton) talks about equal pay and the gender wage gap.

He explains that equal pay policies based on wage outcomes have had little effect on the gender wage gap. Instead, economic policies that promote human capital accumulation and greater lifetime work for women – e.g. subsidizing day care and abolishing marriage taxes – can successfully reduce the gender wage gap further.


For more information on equal pay and the gender wage gap see a related article by Solomon Polachek entitled Equal pay legislation and the gender wage gap, which has been published on IZA World of Labor.

Posted in Videos | Tagged , , , , , , , | Comments Off

TTIP: Think in The Interest of the People!

ttipIn the world of global commerce, two insights stand out: First, the global trading system badly needs a shot in the arm, all the more so as the World Trade Organization’s (WTO) so-called Bali round, agreed to in December 2013, has run into trouble. And second, at a time when it is increasingly difficult to arrive at growth-enhancing global agreements, regional agreements rise in importance as an alternate route for progress on trade liberalization.

The launch of the new Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP), announced in June 2013, represents a promising step in that direction. But even though governments and business organizations were keen to get going, the negotiating process had not even started in full when the bickering about what’s “on the table” and “off the table” was already in full swing.

As a result, the negotiations got bogged down quickly in ever more mind-numbing details. The movement toward an agreement had slowed even before the NSA scandal arose. The latter incident offered some politicians in Europe a platform to call for a timeout on any new trade agreement with the United States.

At the same time, there are those who question the value of any such agreement by arguing that the economic benefits which an eventual transatlantic deal may yield are rather small. They point to the existing intensity of bilateral trade and the extensive presence of US firms in the European market, and vice versa. The worry that lies behind these concerns is that only large corporations would benefit, but not the populations at large.

As a labor economist and someone who has long believed in the vitality of the transatlantic relationship, I can only warn against such thinking. In my view, we are not thinking big enough.

Continue reading

Posted in Opinions | Tagged , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off