• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

IZA Newsroom

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Press Lounge
  • DE
  • EN
IZA NewsResearchOctober 14, 2019

Identifying policy levers in education settings

4th IZA Workshop on the Economics of Education

© iStockphoto.com/Heimsmyndir

Although it might not appear to be the most obvious topic for an economist to work on, the analysis of determinants of educational success has become one of the fastest growing subfields of economics. The IZA program area on the Economics of Education connects many of the leading researchers in this area and its 4th annual workshop, held in Bonn recently, has again proven to be a major success story.

Organized by Ian Walker and Ingo Isphording, this years’ workshop brought together 25 international researchers to present state-of-the art advances that reflected the broad range of policy-relevant topics economists care about in understanding the production of human capital, starting from what makes parents choose the right school for their offspring, to incentivizing teachers to bring out the best in their students, to how exposure to violence can affect student performance.

The keynote speech was given by John N. Friedman, who demonstrated the potential behind using big data approaches on tax data to dig into spatial variations of intergenerational mobility, and the role of higher education in shaping opportunities to leave poverty.

Why schools are segregated

Sándor Sóvágó presented evidence on school segregation in the Netherlands. Based on administrative data from Amsterdam secondary schools, he identified the assignment of students to schools based on their ability, and differences in the preferences of households as the main sources of segregation. His results imply that while quotas for minority students would reduce segregation, this effect would come at a large expense of student welfare by assigning students to schools against their preferences.

How student fees affect study behavior

Jan Marcus analyzed how the introduction of student fees in Germany affected the study behavior of current students. His results showed that even modest fees have important incentive effects on students and shorten their duration of studies. Students who have to pay fees increase their study effort and time investment. For students not yet enrolled though, student fees very well have negative effects by discouraging them from undertaking tertiary education.

Taken together, the presentations (see the workshop program for a full list) led to lively discussions and exchange among the mix of junior and senior researchers, highlighted the importance of education as the main driver for labor market success later in life, and pointed to important but often under-utilized policy levers.

Share this article

Share on X Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share via e-mail
  • education
Previous Post
Shuffle
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • May 5, 2025

    Brexit’s hidden cost: Higher patient mortality in NHS hospitals
  • April 29, 2025

    How community networks shape elections after a crisis
  • March 27, 2025

    How do future elites view inequality?

Related Content

  • September 21, 2020

    How a second chance in education influences labor market outcomes
  • December 6, 2024

    Education increases family formation among women but has no effect on men
  • April 15, 2019

    briq/IZA Workshop on Behavioral Economics of Education
  • 
  • 
  • Archive
  • 
  • IZA News
  • 
  • Identifying policy levers in education settings

© 2013–2025 Deutsche Post STIFTUNGImprint | Privacy PolicyIZA