• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

IZA Newsroom

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Press Lounge
  • DE
  • EN
ResearchNovember 29, 2013

Learning from nuns: Catholic schools are not better than the rest

Several empirical studies have attempted to assess whether private schools provide better education than public schools. This question is crucial both for educational policy and parents’ school choice. Advocates of school competition often base their arguments on evidence suggesting positive effects of private schooling on educational outcomes. Indeed many studies have demonstrated a positive correlation between Catholic school attendance, which account for the largest share of private schools, and educational outcomes. Yet, a causal interpretation of this relationship is only valid if there are no other unobserved characteristics, such as student ability, that affect school choice and educational outcomes.

A new IZA discussion paper by Rania Gihleb and Osea Giuntella investigates whether the positive correlation between Catholic school attendance and educational outcomes is actually causal by using a novel approach that exploits an “religious earthquake” occurring in Rome in the early 1960s: With the universal call to holiness and the opening to lay leadership, the Second Vatican Council inadvertently produced a dramatic change in the cost and benefits of religious life and drained Catholic schools of critical human capital. Between 1966 and 1980, the number of Catholic sisters (nuns) was reduced by more than 30% and the share of religious teachers in Catholic schools fell by more than 50%. Because religious teachers were paid, on average, one-third the amount that lay teachers were paid, the sudden and rapid shift in personnel imposed severe financial constraints on Catholic schools and forced many schools to close.

Exploiting these supply shocks to Catholic schools, the authors merge diocesan data and data from the US Census to investigate whether Catholic schools indeed produce better students. Assuming that the demand for Catholic schools was unaffected by the “religious earthquake”, Gihleb and Giuntella show that there is no evidence of a positive effects of attending a Catholic school on student outcomes. If anything, they find evidence of negative effects. These results, in turn, suggest that the correlation between Catholic schooling and student outcomes are entirely driven by a positive selection of the students. In other words, students of Catholic schools are likely to be smarter already before attending the school.

Featured Paper:

IZA Discussion Paper No. 7753 Nuns and the Effects of Catholic Schools: Evidence from Vatican II Rania Gihleb, Osea Giuntella

Share this article

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share via e-mail
  • education
  • educational policy
  • private school
  • public school
  • Second Vatican Council
  • selection
  • teacher
  • Osea Giuntella
  • Rania Gihleb
Previous Post
Shuffle
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

COVID-19 and the Labor Market

covid-19.iza.org

Recent Posts

  • March 6, 2023

    IZA promotes innovative economic research on climate change
  • March 3, 2023

    How immigration affects housing costs
  • February 16, 2023

    G²LM|LIC Call for Proposals

Related Content

  • October 13, 2020

    School re-openings after summer breaks in Germany did not increase SARS-CoV-2 cases
  • February 14, 2014

    Better high school, better university performance
  • August 9, 2019

    Incentivizing learning-by-doing
  • 
  • 
  • Archive
  • 
  • Research
  • 
  • Learning from nuns: Catholic schools are not better than the rest

© 2013–2023 Deutsche Post STIFTUNGImprint | Privacy PolicyIZA