The introduction of Viagra in 1998 changed the world of men suffering from erectile dysfunction. Up until then, there were nearly no remedies available that could have helped men effectively. No wonder that within a few months after its introduction, Viagra dominated the market. Until today, Viagra has been prescribed to approximately 37 million men worldwide.
In a new IZA Discussion Paper, which is forthcoming in Economic Enquiry, Jacob LaRiviere and Hendrik Wolff analyze how the little blue pill influenced lifestyle and behavior of elderly men in the U.S. In a nutshell, the introduction of Viagra seemed to have influenced short-term rather than long-term behavior. On the one hand, Gonorrhea rates for men older than 45 increased by 15-28 percent. Apparently, the drug had an effect on short-term decisions of older men to become more open to risky sexual relationships, increasing the amount of infections with sexual transmittable diseases. On the other hand, the authors find no influence of Viagra on long-term-decisions as divorce and natality rates of the target population are not affected.
In most Western countries children of welfare recipients are more likely to receive welfare benefits themselves. However, it is not clear if this link is causal or driven by other factors. A theory in line with the causal interpretation is that benefit receiving families create an own culture, in which it is “normal” to receive welfare. A different theory suggests that the determinants of poverty and poor health are correlated, but there is no causality.
Entrepreneurship is an important source of innovation and technological change. And as standard macro theory suggests, these are main drivers of growth and prosperity. For a long time entrepreneurs were stereotyped as “lone wolves”, but this is not necessarily true. Start-ups are often led by teams. This raises the question what kind of teams are most successful in setting up a firm.
Given the large differences in youth unemployment rates across Europe, one would expect young people to migrate from countries with high unemployment rates to those with better job prospects. But in reality, migration across European countries is still much lower than across the United States. One of the key reasons is the language barrier within the EU, which could be overcome with better language education, as a
Absenteeism is a cause of substantial loss of working time worldwide. In some OECD countries nearly 10 percent of annual working days are lost because of sickness absence. The costs are considerable for employers, co-workers, and health and benefit systems. Among cash benefits, sickness insurance – which compensates workers for their earnings losses – is one of the most important social protection schemes in Europe.
In light of the recent recession and demands by some observers that Greece and other Southern European countries should leave the Eurozone, politicians often point to the benefits of European integration for all countries. Without the EU, they say, growth and prosperity in Europe would not be as high as they are. But to date there are few reliable studies that quantify these benefits.
Research on employers’ hiring discrimination is limited by the unlawfulness of such activity. Observational studies report lower wages for minority, but may be affected by the difficulty of comparing “like for like”. An alternative strand of research focuses on the intention to hire. Typically, fake CVs, differing only by the implied race of the applicant, are sent to recruiting employers. Differences in callback rates imply discrimination in the hiring process. However, these studies can only observe the variation in callback rates, not in hiring decisions.
Students who sleep seven hours per night during the exam period score an average of 1.7 points higher (on a scale of 20) on their exams than peers who get only six hours of sleep. In a
By
Welfare benefits are a double-edged sword. On the one hand, the poor need them to survive, on the other hand they provide an incentive to withdraw from the labor market and live off the government transfers – especially if these transfers are generous. The situation is especially difficult for single mothers who have to combine work and childcare and therefore often have even lower incentives to work. The Netherlands have a quite generous social security system, with low work incentives for single mothers: Before 2009, when a mother started working in a part-time job, her labor income reduced welfare benefits one-for-one.