• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

IZA Newsroom

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Press Lounge
  • DE
  • EN
ResearchSeptember 18, 2017

Gender bias in teaching evaluations by economics students

In an ongoing heated debate on sexism in the economic profession, sparked by an analysis by Alice Wu of sexist speech in an anonymous online forum, economists see themselves accused of discrimination against women in the profession. Indeed, female professors are scarce. Although the share of female students enrolling in graduate programs has increased over the last decades, the proportion of women who continue their careers in academia remains low.

A new IZA discussion paper contributes to this discussion by providing empirical evidence on gender bias in academia, this time studying how economics and business students evaluate female teachers different from their male counterparts.

Using data on about 20,000 evaluations of instructors from the School of Business and Economics at Maastricht University, a leading business school in Europe, Friederike Mengel, Jan Sauermann and Ulf Zölitz demonstrate a systematic bias against women in end-of-class teaching evaluations.

Relying on random assignment of students to instructors teaching within the same type of courses, the authors pin down the causal impact of instructor gender on evaluations, grades and future performance.

The results are worrying. Female faculty receive systematically lower teaching evaluations than their male colleagues despite the fact that neither students’ current or future grades nor the effort they put into studying are affected by the gender of the instructor.

The lower teaching evaluations of female faculty stem mostly from male students, but female students also tend to give lower evaluations to their female teachers, albeit to a lower degree. Strikingly, even text books and other teaching material, such as the online learning platform – clearly independent of the gender of the teacher – receive lower evaluations if a course is taught by a female teacher.

In the competitive world of academia, student evaluations are an important and frequently used assessment criterion for faculty performance. Gender bias in teaching evaluations affects hiring, tenure and promotion decisions and, thus, is likely to have a strong impact on career progression of women in academia.

Mentioned Papers

IZA Discussion Paper No. 11000 Gender Bias in Teaching Evaluations Friederike Mengel, Jan Sauermann, Ulf Zölitz

Share this article

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share via e-mail
  • academia
  • discrimination
  • economics
  • gender bias
  • hiring
  • professor
  • promotion
  • teaching
  • tenure
  • women
  • Friederike Mengel
  • Jan Sauermann
  • Ulf Zölitz
Previous Post
Shuffle
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

COVID-19 and the Labor Market

covid-19.iza.org

Recent Posts

  • January 23, 2023

    Does immigration undermine social cohesion in the receiving country?
  • December 19, 2022

    Immigration or automation?
  • November 16, 2022

    Skilled immigration spurs innovation

Related Content

  • December 22, 2015

    Racial mismatch in the classroom leads to more unexcused student absences and school suspensions
  • March 17, 2017

    The gender pay gap: Discrimination or structural differences?
  • January 4, 2019

    Stalled progress of women in economics
  • 
  • 
  • Archive
  • 
  • Research
  • 
  • Gender bias in teaching evaluations by economics students

© 2013–2023 Deutsche Post STIFTUNGImprint | Privacy PolicyIZA