• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

IZA Newsroom

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Press Lounge
  • DE
  • EN
ResearchDecember 3, 2024

When crisis strikes, voters hold female politicians to harsher standards

COVID-19 exposed gender bias in reelection

© IZA, created with Midjourney

A recent IZA discussion paper by Zohal Hessami and Temurbek Khasanboev examines how crises exacerbate gender biases in the reelection of incumbent politicians. Using data from local council elections in the German state of Hesse in March 2021, the researchers reveal the disproportionate electoral penalties faced by female politicians during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Female incumbents penalized twice as harshly at the ballot box

Despite having no direct role in pandemic management, local councilors experienced shifts in voter behavior tied to COVID-19 outcomes. The study found that reelection probabilities for incumbents decreased in municipalities with higher mortality rates. Critically, female incumbents were penalized almost twice as harshly as male incumbents. At the average mortality rate of one death per 1,000 inhabitants, an additional death reduced reelection probabilities by 4.3 percentage points for male incumbents and by 7.8 points for female incumbents.

The gender blame attribution gap

This disparity highlights a “gender blame attribution gap,” where voters disproportionately hold female politicians accountable during crises, irrespective of their actual involvement or performance. The study rigorously tested this hypothesis across various candidate, party, and municipal characteristics, confirming the robustness of these findings. Notably, this bias exacerbates gender underrepresentation in local councils, with simulations predicting a persistent 3–4 percentage point gap in female representation for at least a decade.

Long-term impacts on political representation

The study emphasizes the implications of this gendered electoral bias for policy outcomes. In smaller councils, even one fewer female member can influence decisions on public goods such as childcare provision. This underscores the broader societal costs of gender-biased electoral dynamics during crises.

This research not only contributes to understanding the barriers to gender equality in politics but also provides actionable insights for policymakers aiming to foster equitable political representation. The findings call for awareness and structural changes to mitigate crisis-induced biases in voter behavior.

Featured Paper:

IZA Discussion Paper No. 17081 Gender Bias in the Reelection of Politicians (When a Crisis Strikes) Zohal Hessami, Temurbek Khasanboev

Share this article

Share on X Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share via e-mail
  • crisis
  • gender
  • incumbency
  • local elections
  • political selection
  • voting
  • Temurbek Khasanboev
  • Zohal Hessami
Previous Post
Shuffle
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • June 4, 2025

    How workplaces shape the economic impact of caregiving shocks on mothers
  • June 2, 2025

    How administrative data fosters young economists’ careers
  • May 30, 2025

    Raising the glass raises risks for the whole family

Related Content

  • October 9, 2019

    Do workers discriminate against female bosses?
  • May 14, 2020

    How firms in Germany react to the COVID-19 crisis
  • October 13, 2018

    Female leadership raises team performance
  • 
  • 
  • Archive
  • 
  • Research
  • 
  • When crisis strikes, voters hold female politicians to harsher standards

© 2013–2025 Deutsche Post STIFTUNGImprint | Privacy PolicyIZA