• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

IZA Newsroom

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Press Lounge
  • DE
  • EN
ResearchOctober 17, 2023

Who benefits and who loses from affirmative action in elite universities?

Study from Brazil shows that earnings rise for minority students but drop for top enrollees

© iStock.com/DMEPhotography

Many elite universities face pressure to increase the diversity of their student body. A central question is whether these universities can do this without changing the benefits they offer to all their students. A recent IZA discussion paper by Cecilia Machado, Germán Reyes, and Evan Riehl, which is now forthcoming in the Journal of Labor Economics, sheds light on this question by studying the impacts of an affirmative action policy implemented by Rio de Janeiro State University (UERJ), one of Brazil’s elite universities.

UERJ was one of the first universities in the country to introduce large-scale affirmative action. It did so in the early 2000s by reserving almost half of its slots for racial minorities and students from low-income families.

The first question addressed by the study:

Did affirmative action benefit the students it was meant to help?

The answer is yes, at least initially. Students who got into UERJ because of affirmative action earned 14% more in their early jobs (see Figure 1, Panel C). This earnings benefit was partly because they got jobs at good firms associated with the alumni network of UERJ. But this benefit seemed to decrease as they moved further into their careers.

Figure 1. Regression discontinuity graphs for UERJ enrollment, earnings, and employment at alumni firms

Notes: This figure shows regression discontinuity graphs for pre-affirmative action general applicants (blue diamonds), post-affirmative action general applicants (red circles), and affirmative action applicants (black triangles). The x-axis in each panel is an applicant’s standardized admission score normalized to zero at the cutoff. The y-axis plots means of each outcome in 0.1 SD bins of the standardized score. Outcomes are measured 6–9 years after UERJ application in Panels C and E, and 10–13 years after application in Panels D and F. Lines are predicted values from local linear regressions estimated with a triangular kernel.

The second key question addressed by the study:

Did affirmative action affect other UERJ students’ outcomes?

The answer here is also yes. The earnings of “top enrollees”—students who could gain admission whether or not affirmative action existed—decreased after the implementation of the policy (see Figure 2, Panel A). Two main reasons seem to explain this. First, they accumulated less human capital throughout college. Second, the value of the jobs associated with UERJ’s alumni network decreased after the introduction of the policy. This suggests that the change in student body composition from affirmative action reduced the learning and networking prospects of UERJ’s top students.

Figure 2. Event study estimates for individual and firm mean hourly wages 6–9 years applying to UERJ

Notes: This figure plots coefficients from an event study. Dashed lines are 95% confidence intervals using standard errors clustered at the program level. The dependent variables are log hourly wage (Panel A) and firm mean log hourly wage (Panel B) measured 6–9 years after application. Red markers show estimates for top enrollees. Blue markers show estimates for other enrollees. The vertical grey line indicates when the affirmative policy was introduced.

What lesson can we learn from Brazil’s experience? Elite universities face a difficult decision. While they want to help students from different backgrounds, they also want to keep offering the same value to all their students. The results of the study can explain why many top universities have historically given preference to high-income and high-achieving students and why they remain hesitant to admit a large number of students from disadvantaged backgrounds.

Featured Paper:

IZA Discussion Paper No. 15026 Alumni Job Networks at Elite Universities and the Efficacy of Affirmative Action Cecilia Machado, Germán Reyes, Evan Riehl

Share this article

Share on X Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share via e-mail
  • affirmative action
  • education
  • elite universities
  • human capital
  • Cecilia Machado
  • Evan Riehl
  • Germán Reyes
Previous Post
Shuffle
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • June 4, 2025

    How workplaces shape the economic impact of caregiving shocks on mothers
  • June 2, 2025

    How administrative data fosters young economists’ careers
  • May 30, 2025

    Raising the glass raises risks for the whole family

Related Content

  • March 27, 2025

    How do future elites view inequality?
  • December 18, 2014

    Girls benefit most from attending an elite school
  • October 10, 2019

    Legacy and athlete preferences at Harvard
  • 
  • 
  • Archive
  • 
  • Research
  • 
  • Who benefits and who loses from affirmative action in elite universities?

© 2013–2025 Deutsche Post STIFTUNGImprint | Privacy PolicyIZA