• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

IZA Newsroom

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Press Lounge
  • DE
  • EN
ResearchOctober 5, 2018

Does faster reintegration of the unemployed reduce job quality?

Two studies from Switzerland analyze the effects of job search requirements and assistance

© iStock.com/da-kuk

Active labor market policies aim at a fast reintegration of the unemployed into the labor market. Since finding a new job requires both search effort and application skills, job centers may try to improve both by increasing the search requirements for unemployment benefit recipients and providing them with job search assistance, respectively. Two recent IZA discussion papers investigate how these approaches affect employment outcomes in Switzerland.

Stricter search requirements reduce unemployment duration

The paper by Patrick Arni and Amelie Schiprowski analyzes how the level of the search requirement affects the provision of effort, the duration of unemployment and re-employment outcomes. Since job seekers are randomly assigned to caseworkers, who vary with respect to how many applications they require per month, the researchers were able to isolate the effect of stricter search requirements.

Their study shows that the duration of unemployment decreases by 3% when the requirement increases by one monthly job application. Changes in the requirement mostly affect lower-skilled job seekers. For skilled job seekers, targeting the quantity of job applications appears to be less effective. Moreover, the effects are larger among individuals who exhibited lower levels of voluntary effort prior to the first caseworker meeting.

These results show that the setting of individual effort targets to steer job search can be a successful strategy for labor market policy. However, when considering the longer run, the authors find modest reactions of re-employment job quality to requirements. An additionally required job application causes re-employment spells to shorten by 0.3%, while the effects on wages are zero. Strengthening the requirement regime thus seems to only marginally reduce job quality.

Job search assistance raises employment only in the short run

The paper by Lionel Cottier, Yves Flückiger, Pierre Kempeneers and Rafael Lalive looks at the long-term effects of a  job search assistance program designed by a job placement firm in Geneva to help the long-term unemployed. The program offered guidance on writing job applications and help in finding job vacancies.

In the short run, the program significantly improved job-seekers’ re-entry into the labor force, with a difference of around four percentage points compared to the control group. In the medium run, though, these positive effects vanish and both groups have a similar performance until approximately two years after the experiment. Then, the patterns revert: Treated job seekers are less likely to be employed than their control group counterparts. The difference is significant up to three years after the experiment and finally disappears when looking at a longer horizon.

The authors find that the program probably reduced employment stability by lowering job quality. Many participants leave their new job exactly once they qualify again for unemployment benefits. The results show that job search programs can place job seekers fast but at the expense of employment stability. Evaluations of such programs should thus assess whether job quality is affected and adopt a long time horizon to assess employment stability.

Featured Papers:

IZA Discussion Paper No. 11765 Job Search Requirements, Effort Provision and Labor Market Outcomes Patrick Arni, Amelie Schiprowski IZA Discussion Paper No. 11766 Does Job Search Assistance Really Raise Employment? Lionel Cottier, Yves Flückiger, Pierre Kempeneers, Rafael Lalive

Share this article

Share on X Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share via e-mail
  • active labor market policies
  • behavior
  • employment
  • Switzerland
  • unemployment
  • Amelie Schiprowski
  • Lionel Cottier
  • Patrick Arni
  • Pierre Kempeneers
  • Rafael Lalive
  • Yves Flückiger
Previous Post
Shuffle
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

Recent Posts

  • June 4, 2025

    How workplaces shape the economic impact of caregiving shocks on mothers
  • June 2, 2025

    How administrative data fosters young economists’ careers
  • May 30, 2025

    Raising the glass raises risks for the whole family

Related Content

  • December 6, 2016

    “Jobs for Development”: How job creation can drive progress and what policies can support this process
  • December 21, 2024

    High returns to making job applications easier
  • December 19, 2019

    Are women more willing to accept jobs with lower pay?
  • 
  • 
  • Archive
  • 
  • Research
  • 
  • Does faster reintegration of the unemployed reduce job quality?

© 2013–2025 Deutsche Post STIFTUNGImprint | Privacy PolicyIZA