• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

IZA Newsroom

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Press Lounge
  • DE
  • EN
ResearchJuly 27, 2015

“When the going gets tough, the tough major in STEM fields”

The consequences of economic fluctuations are large and long-lasting, and can have an especially strong influence on investment choices. A new study by Erica Blom, Brian C. Cadena, and Benjamin J. Keys provides new insights into how personal exposure to the business cycle affects the choice of college major, a key investment in human capital.

The authors use data from more than 50 cohorts of U.S. college graduates in the American Community Survey (ACS) to estimate how responsive college students are in their choice of major. The results show that, when unemployment is high, students choose majors that are higher-paid, more math-heavy and challenging, suggesting that students consider college as an “investment” more than as “consumption” when times are bad.

Much of these changes in major choices can be attributed to differences in particular majors’ labor market prospects, as some majors are hurt more in recessions than others. However, the authors also show other meaningful changes in the distribution of majors. Notably, women are more responsive than men, and women move away from traditionally female-dominated majors like sociology and education during recessions, and towards math-intensive majors (like business, engineering, etc.). The findings suggest that the economic environment changes how students select majors, possibly by encouraging them to consider a broader range of possible degree fields.

In the area of STEM education, the authors identify a latent supply of college students with sufficient ability to complete STEM fields. A rise in the unemployment rate encourages more students to pursue STEM majors, which implies that a substantial fraction of each cohort has sufficient preparation for STEM fields, and suggests room for potential policy intervention.

Finally, while an extensive literature has documented significant costs to graduating in a recession, the authors note that the impact of graduating in a recession would be even more negative if students were unable to respond by picking different majors. By leaving fields that are hurt most during recessions and entering more “recession-proof” fields like engineering and nursing, students are able to partially offset the costs of graduating in a recession. The authors estimate that, without this compensatory behavior, the damaging effects of graduating in a recession would be roughly 10 percent larger.

  • Read also an article about this paper in Slate magazine.

Featured Paper:

IZA Discussion Paper No. 9167 Investment over the Business Cycle: Insights from College Major Choice Erica Blom, Brian C. Cadena, Benjamin J. Keys

Share this article

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share via e-mail
  • business cycle
  • college major
  • consumption
  • economic environment
  • economic fluctuations
  • graduating
  • investment
  • investment choices
  • labor market prospects
  • recessions
  • STEM
  • students
  • Benjamin J. Keys
  • Brian C. Cadena
  • Erica Blom
Previous Post
Shuffle
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

COVID-19 and the Labor Market

covid-19.iza.org

Recent Posts

  • July 25, 2022

    Children benefit from longer parental leave
  • June 24, 2022

    Minimum wage increases lead to substantial declines in vacancy postings
  • May 23, 2022

    Minimum wage contributed to rise in solo self-employment

Related Content

  • August 5, 2016

    Women’s chances in STEM fields better than often thought
  • June 17, 2015

    How to increase the attractiveness of STEM for female students
  • December 10, 2018

    Steering more students into STEM?
  • 
  • 
  • Archive
  • 
  • Research
  • 
  • “When the going gets tough, the tough major in STEM fields”

© 2013–2022 Deutsche Post STIFTUNGImprint | Privacy PolicyIZA