• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

IZA Newsroom

IZA – Institute of Labor Economics

  • Home
  • Archive
  • Press Lounge
  • DE
  • EN
ResearchJuly 12, 2019

Higher absence rates in the public than the private sector

German public sector employees are more likely to stay home sick

© iStockphoto.com/Clerkenwell

Public sector employees are often said to have excessive rates of absence from work, which gives rise to the stereotype of the “malingering bureaucrat”. To find out whether this is correct, a recent IZA discussion paper by Stephanie Prümer and Claus Schnabel analyzed representative survey data for Germany in 2012. The authors find that absenteeism seems indeed to be more prevalent in the public sector.

Whereas only 53 percent of private sector employees report having been absent at least once in the past 12 months, this figure is 9 percentage points higher for public sector employees. On average public sector employees record one more day of absence per year compared to workers in the private sector. These differences showing up in descriptive statistics are substantially reduced and partly disappear when taking account of individuals’ socio-demographic characteristics, health status, professional activities, and workplace-related factors. Even then, however, the probability of staying home sick at least once a year is still 5.6 percentage points higher in the public sector.

“Malingering bureaucrat” stereotype seems exaggerated

This finding refutes assertions that differences in absence rates between the sectors are mainly due to structural factors like different compositions of the workforce. The study shows that the same observable factors play a role for absenteeism in the public and private sector. It cannot rule out that employees in the two sectors differ in unobservable factors like motivation, commitment, and loyalty towards their employer and their co-workers. It could also be the case that public employers exert less pressure on employees not to call in sick (for instance because they are not so exposed to market pressure).

Nevertheless, since the difference in the probability of sickness absence between similar public and private sector employees is less than 6 percentage points, the authors conclude that the stereotype of the “malingering bureaucrat” seems to be an exaggeration, at least for Germany.

Featured Paper:

IZA Discussion Paper No. 12392 Questioning the Stereotype of the "Malingering Bureaucrat": Absence from Work in the Public and Private Sector in Germany Stephanie Prümer, Claus Schnabel

Share this article

Share on Twitter Share on Facebook Share on LinkedIn Share via e-mail
  • absenteeism
  • private sector
  • public sector
  • sickness absence
  • Claus Schnabel
  • Stephanie Prümer
Previous Post
Shuffle
Next Post

Reader Interactions

Primary Sidebar

COVID-19 and the Labor Market

covid-19.iza.org

Recent Posts

  • March 6, 2023

    IZA promotes innovative economic research on climate change
  • March 3, 2023

    How immigration affects housing costs
  • February 16, 2023

    G²LM|LIC Call for Proposals

Related Content

  • June 23, 2014

    Are government workers really more public-spirited than those in the private sector?
  • October 19, 2016

    Increase in imports adversely affects provision of public services across U.S. localities
  • December 19, 2019

    Are women more willing to accept jobs with lower pay?
  • 
  • 
  • Archive
  • 
  • Research
  • 
  • Higher absence rates in the public than the private sector

© 2013–2023 Deutsche Post STIFTUNGImprint | Privacy PolicyIZA